Marchionne is just an employee of the Lambs.
E 'money paid for them and to act as a lightning rod. Nothing more.
The rawness of its language (and action), which expires in pure provocation for cassintegrati, the fired workers and that they accept all conditions as not to lose their jobs, is unacceptable. His master's muzzle.
If Fiat has every right to move its production overseas, the Italians have a right to present to you even greater profits conto.Per decades of lambs and large shareholders will have Italian taxpayers paid from layoffs when Fiat had accounts in red, with grants for scrapping incentives for factories in the South The Agnelli, whose voice has not yet been heard during the negotiations, weapons and let them Storage, but the first pay tens of billions that are paid to the Italian State.
"We are a group of Italians under 40 years living and working abroad, but who continue to have direct contacts with Italy that bind us affection and nostalgia, accompanied by anger to see it steadily decline.
None of us has so far been directly involved in politics, although sympathetic to the left in its broadest sense, but this what is happening can not remain indifferent. So we decided to express our concerns on some important issues:
- blackmail Marchionne a contract negotiated and not imposed
- calling for a referendum like the plebiscites of the Fascist period in which the only choice is between unemployment and the conditions imposed
by the owner - the exception to constitutional rights recognized by entering into private contracts
- the renunciation of the national collective agreement in the silence of most of Confindustria and the unions (which a priori should have refused to sign a contract other than national the workers at Mirafiori)
- the exclusion of the largest union engineering from the representation sindacale.br> consider it very serious.
We find it even less acceptable in a time of economic crisis and reject the attempt to make the workers pay the costs of the failure of neo-liberalism. We marvel at the awkward silence of most of the opposition, especially the parliament, and we think it's time to stand up sharply. The FIOM not only protects workers at Mirafiori, defends the Constitution, democracy, freedom of choice. Defends, in essence, the possibility of a future for our country, we seem ever more distant. Now stand on the side of workers' rights means to defend a social model based not only on solidarity and equality - that would be ridiculous to define concepts dating - but also on a more equitable distribution of income in order to avoid overproduction crises and speculative bubbles. It means rejecting the intensive use of labor, typical of developing countries and certainly not in the advanced economies. They are not reformers who want to turn back the clock of history, but reactionary. Those who are not heroes, fomenting a war between the poor, lead us on the path of underdevelopment. They are not innovators who, instead of focusing on research and investment in human capital, are simply looking to cut costs with social dumping.
We are convinced that for other attacks on Constitution, rights, and to our social contract, in short, the future of our country, we can stop. This hope is linked to two factors: the disdain for the reality of things and the courage to change. For this we have no doubt: we are with the FIOM. "
"We are a group of Italians under 40 years living and working abroad, but who continue to have direct contacts with Italy that bind us affection and nostalgia, accompanied by anger to see it steadily decline.
None of us has so far been directly involved in politics, although sympathetic to the left in its broadest sense, but this what is happening can not remain indifferent. So we decided to express our concerns on some important issues:
- blackmail Marchionne a contract negotiated and not imposed
- calling for a referendum like the plebiscites of the Fascist period in which the only choice is between unemployment and the conditions imposed
by the owner - the exception to constitutional rights recognized by entering into private contracts
- the renunciation of the national collective agreement in the silence of most of Confindustria and the unions (which a priori should have refused to sign a contract other than national the workers at Mirafiori)
- the exclusion of the largest union engineering from the representation sindacale.br> consider it very serious.
We find it even less acceptable in a time of economic crisis and reject the attempt to make the workers pay the costs of the failure of neo-liberalism. We marvel at the awkward silence of most of the opposition, especially the parliament, and we think it's time to stand up sharply. The FIOM not only protects workers at Mirafiori, defends the Constitution, democracy, freedom of choice. Defends, in essence, the possibility of a future for our country, we seem ever more distant. Now stand on the side of workers' rights means to defend a social model based not only on solidarity and equality - that would be ridiculous to define concepts dating - but also on a more equitable distribution of income in order to avoid overproduction crises and speculative bubbles. It means rejecting the intensive use of labor, typical of developing countries and certainly not in the advanced economies. They are not reformers who want to turn back the clock of history, but reactionary. Those who are not heroes, fomenting a war between the poor, lead us on the path of underdevelopment. They are not innovators who, instead of focusing on research and investment in human capital, are simply looking to cut costs with social dumping.
We are convinced that for other attacks on Constitution, rights, and to our social contract, in short, the future of our country, we can stop. This hope is linked to two factors: the disdain for the reality of things and the courage to change. For this we have no doubt: we are with the FIOM. "
nice letter and agree more on everything, but the problem remains: how can withstand the blows of the low cost of cars produced in China, Korea and India?
Only with technological innovation? Sure enough?
What recipes?
Joker
0 comments:
Post a Comment