With a referendum in 1993 promoted by the Radicals, 90.3% of voters voting (77%) decided to repeal the public financing of political parties. Parties who do not have data for losers, and they quickly remedied the nasty hit.
back in 1996 three years after the referendum, it was subtly reintroduced a system of public financing. In 1999 comes the notorious law on "reimbursement election" (which they called a new "public funding" can not), which is estimated at 800 lire for every vote. In 2002, the Berlusconi government, moving from 800 lire to 1 euro. A rise more than double! In addition, the figure calculated for the "redemption" is fixed and not calculated on the actual voting, but the total number of claimants, the only logic that may be behind this rule is the "Take the Money and Run." It should be noted then that the share of each person entitled to vote rises more and more over time, today has arrived at 5 Euro. Finally, in February 2006, according to the Berlusconi government, Last parasitic bullshit: in case of early dissolution of the payment of the refund is made, however, until the natural end of term. Thing that happened with the previous legislature ended a few months ago. Thus, parties such as Forza Italy, or the PD pocketing double reimbursements. In short, for the year 2008 alone, the total amount of "reimbursements" is equivalent to more than 407 million.
STRANGE discounts -
I wrote "refunds" because in reality this is pure and simple (large, very wide) public financing to political parties because, as demonstrated by the Court of Auditors, for the 2006 political parties have spent a quarter of what has been repaid to them, 117.3 million against 498.5 million.
parties then there are the boxes of money paid them generously by the state. Remember this the next time, for example, hear of or see the loft of the city flooded with huge billboards Faccioni of politicians, it's all our money with which parties and politicians are doing wonderful. Wonderful with people's money.
Money that is within the reach of even the minutest. In fact, other parasitic bullshit, it is not necessary to have elected to parliament in order to share the money: just over 1%. Practically an incentive to begging. The
Udeur of Mastella did not appear the 2008 elections, no problem because he can use until 2011 the assets of the previous legislature. Same goes for the socialists Boselli, who for only 8942 votes did not reach 1% useful to trigger repayments; quiet, there are always those of the previous legislature valid until 2011.
LET'S GO WEST! -
The American system is not perfect and will not be the final solution, but in my opinion is that this shabby auspicabilissimo Italy is moving in that direction. Thanks to American primaries (the real ones, not the ridiculous to the draft that we have seen here in Italy a few months ago) taking place in the U.S., we all have seen Democrats and Republicans as the candidate has been made in four for two things: to be voted and raise money, two things which may be linked, although not necessarily. In fact, brace yourselves, the U.S. parties are not funded by the state. Unbelievable, huh? A country where the state does not grant foraging parties and where democracy goes on just fine, it suffices to observe, precisely, the sparkle of these long Democratic primary elections. The U.S. policy has to go door to door to ask for penny to get ahead in the costly election campaigns, and if the money ends up trouble.
In the U.S. the law is very clear: the money must come from individuals (a maximum of $ 2,300 for other primary and $ 2,300 if the candidate gets the nomination). Companies or unions can not make donations but they can organize PAC, Political Action Committee. That is a kind of mutual fund in which the operator collects the money and decides who donate.
Another method is the so-called 527 committees, which organize campaigns and issues must be independent of the candidate's election campaign. For example, some of these committees, all in favor of the Democrats, George Soros has donated to the campaign of 2004, more than $ 23 million. The common feature of all these methods to finance the policy is the tracking and transparency. The public is aware of the sources of funding of political and take them into account.
VOLUNTARY 'vs. CONSTRAINT -
It is often said that we must fight the degeneration of public money given to political parties but in principle the financing of public policy is a good thing, you just need more moderation.
writer he thinks that there is only one valid reason for which some of our money is devolved to those entities called neck obtorto parties. It is true that public funding crushes corruption, is not it that helps to make a career in politics who is not rich, it is true that ultimately favors the democratic process of a country. This "reimbursement election" is very similar to another Italian fraud, that eight per thousand.
scam in which the Catholic Church is wrong to eat the huge piece of cake available. The mechanism is the same: there is no voluntary offer, there is only the constraint in the name of a mysterious "higher common good."
parties do not have to earn our donations should not ask for anything, they all had to do and hurt and cry to "threat to democracy" if you're tired of being forced to give them money. If we want Italy to become a country more civilized, more alive and more dynamic we must ensure that the voluntary will become the common rule, otherwise forever remain the subjects who are always told by others what is best for them. It is simply to chase the money and shut up, we think all of us, thank you.
JOKER
back in 1996 three years after the referendum, it was subtly reintroduced a system of public financing. In 1999 comes the notorious law on "reimbursement election" (which they called a new "public funding" can not), which is estimated at 800 lire for every vote. In 2002, the Berlusconi government, moving from 800 lire to 1 euro. A rise more than double! In addition, the figure calculated for the "redemption" is fixed and not calculated on the actual voting, but the total number of claimants, the only logic that may be behind this rule is the "Take the Money and Run." It should be noted then that the share of each person entitled to vote rises more and more over time, today has arrived at 5 Euro. Finally, in February 2006, according to the Berlusconi government, Last parasitic bullshit: in case of early dissolution of the payment of the refund is made, however, until the natural end of term. Thing that happened with the previous legislature ended a few months ago. Thus, parties such as Forza Italy, or the PD pocketing double reimbursements. In short, for the year 2008 alone, the total amount of "reimbursements" is equivalent to more than 407 million.
STRANGE discounts -
I wrote "refunds" because in reality this is pure and simple (large, very wide) public financing to political parties because, as demonstrated by the Court of Auditors, for the 2006 political parties have spent a quarter of what has been repaid to them, 117.3 million against 498.5 million.
parties then there are the boxes of money paid them generously by the state. Remember this the next time, for example, hear of or see the loft of the city flooded with huge billboards Faccioni of politicians, it's all our money with which parties and politicians are doing wonderful. Wonderful with people's money.
Money that is within the reach of even the minutest. In fact, other parasitic bullshit, it is not necessary to have elected to parliament in order to share the money: just over 1%. Practically an incentive to begging. The
Udeur of Mastella did not appear the 2008 elections, no problem because he can use until 2011 the assets of the previous legislature. Same goes for the socialists Boselli, who for only 8942 votes did not reach 1% useful to trigger repayments; quiet, there are always those of the previous legislature valid until 2011.
LET'S GO WEST! -
The American system is not perfect and will not be the final solution, but in my opinion is that this shabby auspicabilissimo Italy is moving in that direction. Thanks to American primaries (the real ones, not the ridiculous to the draft that we have seen here in Italy a few months ago) taking place in the U.S., we all have seen Democrats and Republicans as the candidate has been made in four for two things: to be voted and raise money, two things which may be linked, although not necessarily. In fact, brace yourselves, the U.S. parties are not funded by the state. Unbelievable, huh? A country where the state does not grant foraging parties and where democracy goes on just fine, it suffices to observe, precisely, the sparkle of these long Democratic primary elections. The U.S. policy has to go door to door to ask for penny to get ahead in the costly election campaigns, and if the money ends up trouble.
In the U.S. the law is very clear: the money must come from individuals (a maximum of $ 2,300 for other primary and $ 2,300 if the candidate gets the nomination). Companies or unions can not make donations but they can organize PAC, Political Action Committee. That is a kind of mutual fund in which the operator collects the money and decides who donate.
Another method is the so-called 527 committees, which organize campaigns and issues must be independent of the candidate's election campaign. For example, some of these committees, all in favor of the Democrats, George Soros has donated to the campaign of 2004, more than $ 23 million. The common feature of all these methods to finance the policy is the tracking and transparency. The public is aware of the sources of funding of political and take them into account.
VOLUNTARY 'vs. CONSTRAINT -
It is often said that we must fight the degeneration of public money given to political parties but in principle the financing of public policy is a good thing, you just need more moderation.
writer he thinks that there is only one valid reason for which some of our money is devolved to those entities called neck obtorto parties. It is true that public funding crushes corruption, is not it that helps to make a career in politics who is not rich, it is true that ultimately favors the democratic process of a country. This "reimbursement election" is very similar to another Italian fraud, that eight per thousand.
scam in which the Catholic Church is wrong to eat the huge piece of cake available. The mechanism is the same: there is no voluntary offer, there is only the constraint in the name of a mysterious "higher common good."
parties do not have to earn our donations should not ask for anything, they all had to do and hurt and cry to "threat to democracy" if you're tired of being forced to give them money. If we want Italy to become a country more civilized, more alive and more dynamic we must ensure that the voluntary will become the common rule, otherwise forever remain the subjects who are always told by others what is best for them. It is simply to chase the money and shut up, we think all of us, thank you.
JOKER
0 comments:
Post a Comment